It's been raining cats and dogs (sadly, not snakes and tigers and wolves!) all day... good day for a rant.
Last night after work I stopped at a discount retailer to shop for spring clothes - not as though I desperately need new clothes, since I haven't "grown out" of old clothing that fit thirty years ago. Fashions change, and wardrobe favorites wear out - my tastes change with time, and in middle age I find it more difficult than ever to match appropriate styles to my size while shopping out of necessity in the juniors department. The trend in junior clothing seldom seems to be my friend, and many of the junior tops this year bear an astonishing resemblance to lingerie... cute, but entirely unsuitable for the office. AAARGH! I made a mental note to return in the fall when the stores will carry more sedate back-to-college and career clothing in junior sizes.
The expedition wasn't unsuccessful - I did purchase half a dozen items to replenish my spring/fall wardrobe. Half of those say "Made in USA" on the label. Of the others, one was made in Indonesia, one was made in the Phillipines, and the third item says "Knitted in Taiwan, Finished in China." Still, the nature of modern international commerce might mean that the "Made in USA" garments used imported materials from India or Japan, or outsourced various forms of labor to other countries, although the final product was assembled in the USA. Garments assembled in the Phillipines might require sewing machines made in China, or dyes made in Egypt, and factory workers might punch a timeclock made in Germany or depend on contracts from American or European importers for a steady paycheck...
Prices on a number of items I liked seemed high to me because I tend to be a frugal shopper and a bargain hunter. The costlier items seemed expensive on account of "designer labels," or having come from pricier retail chains rather than a noticable difference in quality. My gorgeous "Knitted in Taiwan, Finished in China" sweater, which lacks a designer label, was reduced to a paltry ten dollar clearance price - the sales clerk admired it too, as he rang it up... I can't imagine why nobody snapped it up before me but I was delighted with the find.
I also browsed the store's giftware department. Several stained glass items caught my eye, at prices that saddened me somewhat - I once worked at stained glass restoration and enjoyed glass work as a hobby that led to the work in restoration, so I know how much work goes into assembling an intricate lampshade or panel. The creative work I once enjoyed became uneconomic for me years ago because workers outside the USA can produce similar work more economically, so my sadness seems to have a double edged sting to it.
On one hand, I feel sympathy for workers whose time commands so little value that the fruits of their labors can be resold so cheaply - in looking at such a seemingly underpriced item, and knowing it may have traveled halfway across the globe, then taking a retailer's markup into account on top of that, it's vaguely frightening to think about the worker's wages. On the other hand, I feel a little sorry for myself too - it seems my time is so valuable that I can ill afford to spend much of it doing the things I love to do, like stained glass work or writing - practically, I do better to outsource my time and labor than pursue creative lines of work I might enjoy more for want of "business sense" or marketing instincts.
I guess this issue reflects my weird individual background and character development as well as any other. Confronted with the paradoxical and perplexing nature of such observations as I've described above, it seems almost reflexive for people to assume that government should solve labor and trade disputes. Traditional thinking seems to involve solutions of pitting one arm of government against another...for example, government should subsidize art on the one hand and protect the American worker's interests - and on the other hand, it should fight sweatshops both at home and abroad, and prevent or punish discrimination by employers. I don't believe in a government that can be all things to all people without believing that all people will eventually have equal reason to detest it much as I do, although obviously things have to get worse before the playing field gets nearly even in that respect.
People who object to globalization may offer valid objections to the forms of globalization they observe but they almost inevitably seem to embrace disastrous solutions by lobbying government as the one solution to solve all problems and disparaging free market concepts. People who object to immigration might cultivate a deeper appreciation for the reasons why foreigners may still want to immigrate to the USA, and reflect a bit more thoughtfully about life in a society so hostile to outsiders that it becomes unattractive to immigrants - tourism and commerce seem likely to follow the freedom-seeking entrepreneurial spirit that once "built" America and made it great. It's the socially stagnating forces that benefit from quelching freedom and innovation I distrust; and it takes a government to raise or reward those. Right, Hilary?
I may miss doing stained glass work, but I'm not so shallow as to resent foreigners the opportunity to better themselves and feed their children by producing work more inexpensively than I can even if it's just a job to the foreign worker to do the work I once delighted in. I'm grateful to live in a country that seems attractive to immigrants; that's the most persuasive evidence for the often-heard argument that America is better place to live than other countries. I can't help but wish Americans might retain more openness to aspiring immigrants in search of freedom, and less acceptance of the petty tyrants who'd turn America into the kind of place many immigrants might seek an escape from. I can't help but wish Americans might see the benefits of globalization without expecting some form of globalized government to solve labor problems or trade conflicts that arise. To heck with all the pointless disputes about what sort of government we should have - how about a government that doesn't have the power to butt in to every nook and cranny of people's lives, instead of ceaseless disputes about whose nooks and crannies it should butt into?
I can't help but hope that the day I decide I don't belong here I may feel free to leave, but I'm afraid that until the day comes when I can't leave America it'll feel like home - and if the day ever arrives when America feels totally unlike home, I won't be able to leave. I can't help but sympathize with immigrants in search of a better life - surely it's a poor reflection on any country when people in search of a better life find emigration the best way to pursue it.
If immigrants come to America seeking a life of government handouts instead of "a land of opportunity," I don't see the logic of ousting or restricting immigrants. A government that actually worked to preserve and protect liberty would invite immigrants seeking freedom, not government handouts. All things considered as far as globalization goes, I'd hope the last thing America ever willingly exports to the world is its government, and any signs that the American people object to a government that aspires to be our primary export seem encouraging. Whatever else, let us not globalize government - small local ones are bad enough to deal with!!!
Well, I've got new clothes to wear to work and I didn't have to make them... I guess I'd look strange at the office if I went to work clothed in anarchist writings or a stained glass outfit anyway. #@&%!
Recent comments
11 hours 57 min ago
2 days 5 hours ago
2 days 5 hours ago
2 days 6 hours ago
2 days 7 hours ago
4 days 7 hours ago
4 days 10 hours ago
4 days 11 hours ago
5 days 3 hours ago
5 days 4 hours ago