Freedom Always Originates from Within

Sunni's picture

How refreshing—I just read an open letter that I actually liked! No, it isn’t one of those increasingly silly open letters over at RP Central.

Here’s a taste, so you can see for yourself how meaty this one is:

... I think that hoping to take an out-of-control, overgrown carnivore, “a terrifying master” as Thomas Jefferson called it, and attempt to domesticate it, transform it back into a dangerous servant and expect it to perform for us without becoming immediately hungry for our flesh again is unrealistic. It’s not a chance I’m willing to take. It’s certainly not one with which I’m willing to get on board, hoist a flag and set sail.

I don’t abstain from voting ... because I’m lazy, stupid, uniformed or pessimistic. I can only hope the other millions of non-voters are thinking people too. I don’t abstain from politics because I doubt the sincerity of those who embrace freedom or any other truly noble cause. My little heart simply won’t let me partake of the forbidden fruit because government is the downfall of mankind. It can never be its solution or its savior.

If that leaves you wanting more, head over to Strike the Root for I Will Not Compromise, by Retta Fontana.

Since I’m already on the subject, for those of you who’ve asked, here’s my take on this open letter—which, curiously, RP Herd Monkey Central modified before publishing, removing links to resources with content critical of the Herd Monkey Movement. I found the letter a curious muddle, and not the least bit persuasive. This is one of the oddest bits (all links in original):

... aren't you at least thankful that Paul's candidacy has inspired so many outstanding grassroots efforts, e.g., the 5th of November "Money Bomb", the Tea Party celebration, the Ron Paul Blimp, etc.?

No, I am not the least bit thankful for those efforts—in fact, I am very dismayed by them. While they appear to be genuine “grassroots efforts”, each and every one of them is a political fundraising campaign. Cheerleading for a man in the popularity contest. Were we not supposed to notice that? How are anarchists and principled nonvoters supposed to feel “thankful” watching all that money get thrown away?

I respect that others can do what they choose with their money (and bit my tongue hard when MAL told me he’d contributed to one of those efforts); nonetheless, I look at all the money going into the cheerleading and it sickens me. Those millions of dollars aren’t creating anything of value—hell, it isn’t even buying substantive educational opportunities for the freedom philosophy. I can’t help but wonder how much better many contributors’ lives might be if, instead of joining the herd monkey cheerleading, they’d taken whatever was contributed and instead put it toward something to help them achieve a greater measure of personal freedom ... like buying a gun or getting firearms training; learning some skill that can help support the person in case the shit hits the fan (and it’s getting closer to doing so); growing a garden and selling and/or preserving the excess; or even paying down debt. Each of those things would materially advance one’s real freedom. Or one could buy goods and services from pro-freedom individuals; there are many out there, offering a variety of things, from web services to books to jewelry to candy. (More on this soon.)

I did find some good in that letter, and would like to repeat it here (links in original; bold emphasis mine):

... you first need to find freedom in yourself. Consider the things that are "tying you down" or "holding you back" and take action to become free from them. Continue to educate yourself about the freedom philosophy, by reading and by thinking about what you read. Continue to take steps in your own life to minimize the impact of not only the power of the State, but of other presumed "authorities."

Absolutely. But how does voting, or donating to the popularity contest machinery, accomplish any of those things? The answer is that they don’t, of course, which is why the author tries but fails to move from that to a successful exhortation for those like me to join the herd.

All freedom originates from within. A person can decide at any time that he is tired of asking for permission to live—which is what we are doing when we cooperate with the state’s identification, enumeration, licensing, relationship-approving, and other permission-slipping crap—and start to live as a free person. No, it isn’t always easy, and one cannot accomplish everything a free person should be able to do without state interference (travel by just about any means above on foot being the most obvious, and most egregious example). It is an individualistic vision and pursuit. As such no amount of groupthink will free a person who does not want to be freer.

You truly want a free society? Then stop chirping and obsessing about the best leader—cuz there ain’t such a beast—and be your own leader. Identify your vision of liberty and start working toward it. Starve the state and support others who are doing likewise. When others notice and ask, answer their questions respectfully and simply, allowing them time to absorb and think. It isn’t glamorous, and it won’t get you mentioned in any mainstream press, but it is the real revolution.

Amen!

I've grown weary of trying to explain this to a lot of people I care about.

No human being has the right -- under any circumstances -- to initiate force against another human being, nor to threaten or delegate its initiation. The Zero Aggression Principle

This has got to be the bottom line. If anything violates this LAW, it doesn't belong in my life... and never will.

I agree about my time (and money)

I last spent a notable amount of time on a political campaign in 2002 (Ed Thompson for WI Governor). Since then I have not considered spending much time (or money, which seems much like "stored time" to me) on anyone's campaign for anything. (I did march with friends in local parades for an Assembly candidate in 2004; but, for me anyway, that counted as a social occasion rather than a true political one.)

I may take the time to vote in the WI preference primary, if I don't have any personal priority conflicts on that day. I live close to a polling place and I haven't lost my curiosity about voter turnout and the latest equipment the politicos have for engineering their outcomes.

However, I will not spend any large amounts of time on a system I don't believe can improve my life nor that of anyone for which I care. I consider this issue like most others: what costs, benefits and consequences will come from what I can do?

As for "civic duty" and other such "ideas," I have participated in the political system for most of my life as a voter, partisan and candidate. It has never done me any good and wasted vast amounts of time and money. I never signed any constitution. I have no moral obligation to participate, and as of this writing, no legal obligation either.

I prefer a "small government constitutionalist" for President to the other options. However, even in the extraordinarily unlikely case of RP winning the Presidency, what lasting changes would ensue? I suspect if "they" let that happen, "they" would engineer many catastrophic events (perhaps even for RP personally) to claim as consequences of it.

Thanks

Thanks for your comments. I am the author of the "muddled" letter and only found your post just now.

I agree that the money and to some extent time spent in those "grassroots" efforts may appear wasteful, but I wasn't viewing them as political fundraising events. The 5th of November moneybomb was significant (to me at least) not because of Ron Paul, but for the implied connection to "V for Vendetta" (in particular the closing scenes of the people marching). The Tea Party celebration also involved meetings across the country and even in Europe, to listen to freedom advocates (admittedly some of the points made by those speaking were contra-freedom). The RP Blimp I threw in mostly because of the subversion of campaign finance restrictions.

Rockwell requested that I "delete the footnotes and add any necessary references in the text" for publication. So I just deleted the footnotes, because I didn't want to summarize the five links. I was still surprised that he accepted it because it clearly stated that I wasn't arguing for supporting the RP candidacy (and my letter was "about RP", not "on behalf of RP" --although he used that in the article listing). I was also surprised that he left the link to the "you will respect my authoritay!" article (which I specifically added because of LR's religious views).

I am glad that you liked the "find freedom in yourself" paragraph. That probably should have been my concluding argument. In fact, if I had written the letter two weeks later, I would not have included the paragraph about supporting "liberty-friendly political parties". Around that time (before the RP newsletters surfaced), I was reminded of my decision about two years ago not to vote again.

It’s important because it’s true.

I am glad that you liked the "find freedom in yourself" paragraph.

Thank you for including it in your essay. I’m hopeful that it helped some of your readers come to that understanding, because if there’s one thing the RP phenomenon suggests to me, it’s that far too many pro-freedom individuals have not yet grokked this vital truth. While it’s true that the state can and does attempt—and too often and too easily succeeds at—restraining one’s choices and actions, that happens because we allow it to happen. We focus overmuch on the dangers of going against their systems—and concomitantly probably fail to appreciate the full value of successfully doing so. It’s also easier to believe in someone else who seems to have your good intentions in mind than to be fully responsible for one’s own life.

Thanks for signing on here and sharing your thoughts. I hope you’ll stick around!