As I've been seeing to other business over the past couple of days, the business of child-rearing has remained in my mind. As I mentioned in a comment yesterday, creativity is an important element of the undertaking.
Ever since I was old enough to notice it, I've despised the idea of parents treating all their children the same. Not being the oldest child, I felt that my parents unjustly, and unjustifiably tied my options to my elder sibling's behavior -- and I had no control over that! My focus has shifted since then, of course, but I still dislike the practice.
I'm not saying that some children "are more equal than others". I'm saying that children, just like adults, are individuals, and that forgetting that, especially for a parent, can be problematic. Adults don't generally think much about the variability that babies show in acquiring certain skills -- learning to walk and talk chief among them -- as long as it isn't unusually delayed. It's accepted as normal that some children will learn to walk at nine months, and others won't until twelve or even fifteen months. So why is it apparently acceptable to try to use the same learning or disciplinary techniques on different children, just because they're in the same family?
Many people will respond that doing so is only "fair", especially to the children involved. And even though I too railed against the unfairness of the world when I was younger, it didn't take me too long to realize that fairness is one of those grand-sounding schemes that reduce to sucking the uniqueness out of life. Life isn't fair; it is random and capricious and opportunistic, and I think we do ourselves and our children no favors if we expect otherwise. Trying to keep discipline "fair" among children means that square, heptagonal, and decagonal children all are expected to fit into a round slot. It also encourages the children to accept (or endure) such attempts at pruning. Neither of these ideas sits well with my goal of trying to help my children discover and capitalize on the best within themselves.
It took a few attempts at using time-out with my daughter to really bring this lesson home to me. She, unlike her older brother, simply didn't care about being in time out. Thus, a warning of an impending time out wasn't sufficient to get her to rethink her current actions. However, she very much enjoys special mother-daughter time. Thus, telling her that I wouldn't be willing to spend time combing her hair or reading poems to her is highly effective.
Many parents also don't seem to recognize that they can learn a lot from even their young children. The flow of knowledge seems to be thought of as unidirectional, with the parents imparting insights and the children soaking them up. But both are active participants in that dynamic activity, and I think it's very important for children to experience their parents learning new things, rethinking existing ideas, and such. So my children get credit from me when they help me learn something new, or when they enable me to make a connection between things I hadn't seen before. Since everybody gets a turn, so to speak, at being "leader" and "follower", they learn more about social interactions (including how those can differ for girls and boys) and dynamics in addition to whatever subject is under consideration.
I've a feeling I'm not communicating all that I want to very well this morning. But, rather than ramble on, I trust anyone wishing to explore further will ask or comment.
Recent comments
4 hours 11 min ago
5 hours 38 min ago
6 hours 48 min ago
15 hours 40 min ago
17 hours 15 min ago
17 hours 39 min ago
17 hours 54 min ago
18 hours 3 min ago
18 hours 15 min ago
18 hours 26 min ago